Naomi Zewde

Naomi Zewde, PhD MPH, is a fellow at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research (CHPR) and an assistant professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health. She teaches health economics and policy analysis to MPH students and conducts research on policy designs to improve affordability and generosity of health insurance coverage and to reduce inequalities in income and wealth. Her work is published in peer-reviewed scientific outlets (including Health Services Research, Health Affairs, the Journal of Risk and Insurance), policy forums (the Roosevelt Institute, the Jain Family Institute), and the popular press (Ms. Magazine, the New York Times, PBS Newshour).

Prior to joining UCLA, Zewde was an assistant professor at the City University of New York’s Graduate School of Public Health and Policy. She is formerly a post-doctoral scientist at the Columbia School of Social Work at Columbia University.

Zewde has a doctoral degree in health policy, concentrating in economics, from Penn State University and an MPH and BA from Emory University. 

Discover, Connect:

Explore

Publication Placeholder
External Publication

External Publication

In Her Hands: A Guaranteed Income Initiative

In Her Hands (IHH) is a guaranteed income (GI) initiative aimed at addressing persistent economic insecurity among women in neighborhoods with some of Georgia’s highest poverty rates. Co-designed with local residents, the program delivered $20,400 over two years to 654 low-income women across urban, suburban, and rural areas.  

Findings: Unconditional cash transfers enabled participants to stabilize their finances, reduce debt, and build resilience against economic shocks. Over time, participants increased savings, pursued educational and employment goals, improved access to food and healthcare, and invested in their families and communities. As one of the first and largest GI programs in the U.S. South — and the first to include a rural site — IHH offers compelling evidence of the role guaranteed income can play in fostering financial security, advancing equity, and informing inclusive economic policy. 

High-Deductible Health Insurance May Exacerbate Racial And Ethnic Wealth Disparities
Journal Article

Journal Article

High-Deductible Health Insurance May Exacerbate Racial And Ethnic Wealth Disparities

This study examines the equity implications of high-deductible health plans within the context of racial and ethnic wealth disparities. Using restricted data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, authors evaluate the net worth (in 2011–2018) and financial assets (in 2011–2016) of families with private insurance and those in high-deductible health plans with and without an associated health savings account.

Findings: Results represent the first estimates of racial and ethnic wealth disparities within these populations. Results show that white households consistently held significantly more wealth than did Black and Hispanic households across income levels. In the lowest income quartile, privately insured white families had more than 350% more in financial assets than their Black counterparts. Low-income Black and Hispanic families with high-deductible health plans but no savings accounts had median financial assets ($2,200 and $2,000, respectively) that were well below the average family coverage deductible.

Study findings highlight the role of systemic racial wealth disparities, beyond that of income, to establish a unique pathway whereby high deductibles can exacerbate health care inequities.
 

Publication Placeholder
External Publication

External Publication

Basic Health Programs: An Alternative to Public Options?

“Public option” health plans, particularly as enacted in Washington State, have had difficulty meeting their goals of improving affordability for patients and reducing overall health care costs. Some states have instead created a Basic Health Program (BHP), an alternative form of coverage authorized by the Affordable Care Act that replaces marketplace coverage for residents with low incomes who are eligible for premium subsidies. This policy brief analyzes the evolution of Washington’s public option and policy changes made in other states in response to initial rollout challenges and compares these with the policy goals and outcomes of BHPs.

Findings: Washington’s public option initially struggled with provider network participation and price competitiveness. Without sufficient network participation and robust enrollment, public options have few means to improve affordability or lower health care costs. BHPs are unlikely to face the same challenges. They contract with safety-net providers at Medicaid-like rates to cover all households with incomes between 138 percent and 200 percent of the federal poverty level who would otherwise be eligible for marketplace subsidies. A BHP can provide robust affordability with minimal out-of-pocket spending at a low cost to states and the federal government.

Publication Placeholder
Research Report

Research Report

Direct Cash Payments in the Next Recession

Authors propose a new, nationwide program of monthly cash payments that would automatically begin when economic indicators signal a recession and continue until the national unemployment rate begins to decrease. Building upon the successful pandemic direct cash payments which dramatically decreased poverty, this policy would provide automatic, monthly payments to working-class families at the first sign of recession, staving off unemployment and stabilizing families and the American economy. The report outlines key design features of a timely, effective, and anti-racist automatic cash payments policy and provides estimates of its benefits for families by race and income.

Publication Placeholder
External Publication

External Publication

In Her Hands: A Guaranteed Income Initiative

In Her Hands (IHH) is a guaranteed income (GI) initiative aimed at addressing persistent economic insecurity among women in neighborhoods with some of Georgia’s highest poverty rates. Co-designed with local residents, the program delivered $20,400 over two years to 654 low-income women across urban, suburban, and rural areas.  

Findings: Unconditional cash transfers enabled participants to stabilize their finances, reduce debt, and build resilience against economic shocks. Over time, participants increased savings, pursued educational and employment goals, improved access to food and healthcare, and invested in their families and communities. As one of the first and largest GI programs in the U.S. South — and the first to include a rural site — IHH offers compelling evidence of the role guaranteed income can play in fostering financial security, advancing equity, and informing inclusive economic policy. 

View All Publications

High-Deductible Health Insurance May Exacerbate Racial And Ethnic Wealth Disparities
Journal Article

Journal Article

High-Deductible Health Insurance May Exacerbate Racial And Ethnic Wealth Disparities

This study examines the equity implications of high-deductible health plans within the context of racial and ethnic wealth disparities. Using restricted data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, authors evaluate the net worth (in 2011–2018) and financial assets (in 2011–2016) of families with private insurance and those in high-deductible health plans with and without an associated health savings account.

Findings: Results represent the first estimates of racial and ethnic wealth disparities within these populations. Results show that white households consistently held significantly more wealth than did Black and Hispanic households across income levels. In the lowest income quartile, privately insured white families had more than 350% more in financial assets than their Black counterparts. Low-income Black and Hispanic families with high-deductible health plans but no savings accounts had median financial assets ($2,200 and $2,000, respectively) that were well below the average family coverage deductible.

Study findings highlight the role of systemic racial wealth disparities, beyond that of income, to establish a unique pathway whereby high deductibles can exacerbate health care inequities.
 

Publication Placeholder
External Publication

External Publication

Basic Health Programs: An Alternative to Public Options?

“Public option” health plans, particularly as enacted in Washington State, have had difficulty meeting their goals of improving affordability for patients and reducing overall health care costs. Some states have instead created a Basic Health Program (BHP), an alternative form of coverage authorized by the Affordable Care Act that replaces marketplace coverage for residents with low incomes who are eligible for premium subsidies. This policy brief analyzes the evolution of Washington’s public option and policy changes made in other states in response to initial rollout challenges and compares these with the policy goals and outcomes of BHPs.

Findings: Washington’s public option initially struggled with provider network participation and price competitiveness. Without sufficient network participation and robust enrollment, public options have few means to improve affordability or lower health care costs. BHPs are unlikely to face the same challenges. They contract with safety-net providers at Medicaid-like rates to cover all households with incomes between 138 percent and 200 percent of the federal poverty level who would otherwise be eligible for marketplace subsidies. A BHP can provide robust affordability with minimal out-of-pocket spending at a low cost to states and the federal government.

Center in the News

Protect your health and finances: Do you need health insurance?

Naomi Zewde, fellow at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research and assistant professor of health policy and management, shared important reasons why even young adults should have health insurance and what could happen to them financially if they do not. News https://health.usnews.com/health-care/health-insurance/articles/do-i-really-need-health-insurance?int=hp_center_main_article_health

View all In the News

Center in the News

Voices of Environmental Justice: ‘People will die’ — stories behind Trump budget bill

Naomi Zewde, fellow at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, explained how verifying Medicaid eligibility is difficult and the role that plays in disaster response. News https://www.sej.org/publications/voices-environmental-justice/people-will-die-stories-behind-trump-budget-bill

Center in the News

A baby bonds bonanza

Naomi Zewde, fellow at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, spoke to Planet Money's "The Indicator" podcast about the federally funded $1,000 accounts for newborns in the recently adopted budget and how they measure up to baby bonds in addressing wealth inequality. News https://www.npr.org/2025/07/28/1256346019/can-baby-bonds-close-wealth-gap