Journal Article
Estimating the Effects of Hypothetical Loneliness Interventions on Memory Function Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in the United States
Authors examined the impact of sustained and one-time loneliness interventions on memory function among U.S. middle-aged and older adults. Using the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study in 2006–2018, we estimated counterfactual average memory scores over 12 years of follow-up under the following scenarios: (A) a hypothetical intervention eliminating loneliness only at baseline (baseline intervention), (B) a hypothetical intervention eliminating loneliness for 10 years (sustained intervention), and (C) the natural course (no intervention). The analytic sample included 10,136 participants (median baseline age 64 years, representing 50 million community-dwelling adults).
Findings: Over 12 years, estimated mean memory scores declined by 0.58 standardized units under the natural course; the difference in decline (vs natural course) was 0.00 standardized units under the baseline intervention and 0.02 standardized units under the sustained intervention. Compared to the natural course, authors did not find evidence that either the baseline or sustained intervention was associated with better memory function over follow-up.
This article features Yusuke Tsugawa, an affiliate at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.