Vickie Mays, PhD, is a senior fellow at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research (CHPR), a distinguished professor of psychology at UCLA’s College of Letters and Science, a professor of health policy and management at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health (FSPH), special advisor to the Chancellor, and director of the UCLA Bridging Research, Innovation, Training and Education (BRITE) Center for Science, Research and Policy.

Mays’ research expertise centers around mental and physical health disparities affecting racial and ethnic minority groups. She has extensive experience in research and policy development in the area of contextual factors that surround COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS in racial and ethnic minority communities. Additionally, Mays’ work also looks at topics such as the role of discrimination on mental and physical health outcomes, and the availability and access of mental health services for racial, ethnic, and sexual minorities.

Mays directs the NIH-funded UCLA BRITE Center, which was created to support the innovative use of research, science, and policy development to help eliminate disparities in physical and mental health for communities that are traditionally underserved by academic research. The BRITE Center brings academic and community members from many disciplines — psychology, law, public policy, medicine, sociology, and more — to study and address disparities.

Mays teaches courses on mental health services and mental health policies, the health status and health behaviors of racial and ethnic minority groups; research ethics in biomedical and behavioral research in racial/ethnic minority populations; health disparities; research methods in minority research; as well as courses on the social determinants of health and mental health. Additionally, she served as the co-principal investigator of the Center’s California Quality of Life Survey, which studies a cohort of UCLA CHPR’s California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) to understand the prevalence of mental health issues and the contextual factors related to them.

Mays has provided testimony to a number of congressional committees, the National Academy, and other policy-setting groups on her COVID-19 predictive equity model, HIV, mental health, and health disparities research findings. She currently serves as the Co-Chair of the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics work group on SOGI and SDOH which will send reports to the HHS Secretary advising on the format and collection of this data in clinical encounters, administrative data, research, and survey data.

May has authored or co-authored more than 200 peer-reviewed publications and has spoken on multiple national, state, and local media outlets, including The Los Angeles Times, the Guardian, Forbes, and USA Today.

She holds a PhD in clinical psychology from the University of Massachusetts, an MSPH in health services from UCLA FSPH, with postdoctoral training in psychiatric epidemiology and survey research as it applies to ethnic minorities (University of Michigan) and health policy (RAND Corporation).

Discover, Connect:

Explore

An Examination of Ambulatory Care Code Specificity Utilization in ICD-10-CM Compared to ICD-9-CM: Implications for ICD-11 Implementation
Journal Article
Journal Article

An Examination of Ambulatory Care Code Specificity Utilization in ICD-10-CM Compared to ICD-9-CM: Implications for ICD-11 Implementation

The ICD-10-CM classification system contains more specificity than its predecessor ICD-9-CM. A stated reason for transitioning to ICD-10-CM was to increase the availability of detailed data.

This study aims to determine whether the increased specificity contained in ICD-10-CM is utilized in the ambulatory care setting and inform an evidence-based approach to evaluate ICD-11 content for implementation planning in the United States.

Diagnosis codes and text descriptions were extracted from a 25% random sample of the IQVIA Ambulatory EMR-US database for 2014 and 2019. Code utilization data was analyzed for the total and unique number of codes. Frequencies and tests of significance determined the percentage of available codes utilized and the unspecified code rates for both code sets in each year.

Findings: Only 44.6% of available ICD-10-CM codes were used compared to 91.5% of available ICD-9-CM codes. Of the total codes used, 14.5% ICD-9-CM codes were unspecified, while 33.3% ICD-10-CM codes were unspecified.

Even though greater detail is available, a 108.5% increase in using unspecified codes with ICD-10-CM was found. The utilization data analyzed in this study does not support a rationale for the large increase in the number of codes in ICD-10-CM. New technologies and methods are likely needed to fully utilize detailed classification systems.

These results help evaluate the content needed in the United States national ICD standard. This analysis of codes in the current ICD standard is important for ICD-11 evaluation, implementation, and use.

 

Recent Trends and Risk Factors for Chemical and Physical Restraint Use in the Emergency Department Evaluation and Treatment of Trauma Patients
Journal Article
Journal Article

Recent Trends and Risk Factors for Chemical and Physical Restraint Use in the Emergency Department Evaluation and Treatment of Trauma Patients

Despite research linking chemical and physical restraints to negative outcomes including unplanned intubations and psychological distress, there is little guidance for their use in the care of trauma patients. Authors used institutional data to describe recent trends in chemical and physical restraint in the emergency department evaluation and treatment of trauma patients and to identify characteristics associated with their use.

This study includes adult trauma activations at a United States urban level I trauma center from January 2016 to July 2022. Data were collected from the trauma registry and medical record. Researchers assessed the use of chemical restraints and physical restraints during care provided in the trauma resuscitation bay and emergency department.

Findings: Of the 8,112 patients, most were male (74.8%), white (55.8%), and privately insured (35.2%). Overall, 8.1% were restrained with 7.1% chemically restrained and 2.7% physically restrained. Overall restraint use increased 254% from 2016 to 2022 driven primarily by a 460% increase in chemical restraint use including a 630% increase in ketamine administrations. Use of restraints was associated with pre-existing psychotic disorders, intoxication, altered mental status, increasing injury severity, and Medicaid insurance. Chemical restraint administration was associated with a 3.5 percentage point increase in the probability of ICU admission and a 1.0 day increase in hospitalization duration.

In this institutional study, nearly one-in-twelve trauma patients were restrained during emergency department evaluation and treatment. Restraint utilization increased during the study driven primarily by increases in ketamine and restraints utilized during trauma bay evaluation and resuscitation.

Future research should assess the generalizability of these findings. It is important that rigorous guidelines are established to ensure the safe and effective use of restraints in trauma.
 

The Social Context of Mental Health, Bereavement, and Grief (American Journal of Public Health)
Journal Article
Journal Article

The Social Context of Mental Health, Bereavement, and Grief (American Journal of Public Health)

This special issue of the American Journal of Public Health (AJPH), co-edited by UCLA Professor and UCLA CHPR Senior Fellow Vickie Mays, PhD, and UCLA Professor Susan Cochran, PhD, addresses improving the conditions that promote mental health and prevent mental disorders.

The papers explore innovations to infuse a public mental health agenda more thoroughly into interventions, research, and legislative and social policies. 

Topics include the impact of COVID-19 on youths and the need for public health policy advisories that focus on mental health consequences in addition to infection control; the increasing rates of suicide among Black youths, some as young as 5 years of age; the importance of primary care referrals that consider gendered differences in the expression of distress; the history of racism that continues to affect the diagnoses and treatment of African Americans; and the impact of the devastating fire in Lahaina on residents' well-being.

Read the Publication:

Mays also co-authored the following articles in the issue:

The American Dream: Is Immigration Associated with Life Satisfaction for Latinos of Mexican Descent? (Healthcare)
Journal Article
Journal Article

The American Dream: Is Immigration Associated with Life Satisfaction for Latinos of Mexican Descent? (Healthcare)

Summary: The Latino population is one of the largest immigrant groups in the United States, with the majority being of Mexican descent. Whether immigrating to the U.S. is positive for the well-being of Mexican immigrants and future generations is an important question. Authors examined how nativity status and quality of life indicators relate to life satisfaction among foreign-born and U.S.-born Mexican descent Latinos living in California. Participants were from the California Quality of Life Survey, a population-based mental health survey of the California population. 

Findings: Multiple regressions examining sociodemographic and indicators of life satisfaction found higher life satisfaction among the foreign-born compared to U.S.-born: females and individuals reporting more social support, absence of frequent distress, and better physical health. Life satisfaction was lower for U.S.-born Mexicans than for Mexican immigrants. Research, interventions, and policies are needed for mental health equity that address this lack of well-being in U.S.-born Mexican Latinos.

This study uses 2007 and 2012–2012 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) data.

Read the Publication

An Examination of Ambulatory Care Code Specificity Utilization in ICD-10-CM Compared to ICD-9-CM: Implications for ICD-11 Implementation
Journal Article
Journal Article

An Examination of Ambulatory Care Code Specificity Utilization in ICD-10-CM Compared to ICD-9-CM: Implications for ICD-11 Implementation

The ICD-10-CM classification system contains more specificity than its predecessor ICD-9-CM. A stated reason for transitioning to ICD-10-CM was to increase the availability of detailed data.

This study aims to determine whether the increased specificity contained in ICD-10-CM is utilized in the ambulatory care setting and inform an evidence-based approach to evaluate ICD-11 content for implementation planning in the United States.

Diagnosis codes and text descriptions were extracted from a 25% random sample of the IQVIA Ambulatory EMR-US database for 2014 and 2019. Code utilization data was analyzed for the total and unique number of codes. Frequencies and tests of significance determined the percentage of available codes utilized and the unspecified code rates for both code sets in each year.

Findings: Only 44.6% of available ICD-10-CM codes were used compared to 91.5% of available ICD-9-CM codes. Of the total codes used, 14.5% ICD-9-CM codes were unspecified, while 33.3% ICD-10-CM codes were unspecified.

Even though greater detail is available, a 108.5% increase in using unspecified codes with ICD-10-CM was found. The utilization data analyzed in this study does not support a rationale for the large increase in the number of codes in ICD-10-CM. New technologies and methods are likely needed to fully utilize detailed classification systems.

These results help evaluate the content needed in the United States national ICD standard. This analysis of codes in the current ICD standard is important for ICD-11 evaluation, implementation, and use.

 

View All Publications

Recent Trends and Risk Factors for Chemical and Physical Restraint Use in the Emergency Department Evaluation and Treatment of Trauma Patients
Journal Article
Journal Article

Recent Trends and Risk Factors for Chemical and Physical Restraint Use in the Emergency Department Evaluation and Treatment of Trauma Patients

Despite research linking chemical and physical restraints to negative outcomes including unplanned intubations and psychological distress, there is little guidance for their use in the care of trauma patients. Authors used institutional data to describe recent trends in chemical and physical restraint in the emergency department evaluation and treatment of trauma patients and to identify characteristics associated with their use.

This study includes adult trauma activations at a United States urban level I trauma center from January 2016 to July 2022. Data were collected from the trauma registry and medical record. Researchers assessed the use of chemical restraints and physical restraints during care provided in the trauma resuscitation bay and emergency department.

Findings: Of the 8,112 patients, most were male (74.8%), white (55.8%), and privately insured (35.2%). Overall, 8.1% were restrained with 7.1% chemically restrained and 2.7% physically restrained. Overall restraint use increased 254% from 2016 to 2022 driven primarily by a 460% increase in chemical restraint use including a 630% increase in ketamine administrations. Use of restraints was associated with pre-existing psychotic disorders, intoxication, altered mental status, increasing injury severity, and Medicaid insurance. Chemical restraint administration was associated with a 3.5 percentage point increase in the probability of ICU admission and a 1.0 day increase in hospitalization duration.

In this institutional study, nearly one-in-twelve trauma patients were restrained during emergency department evaluation and treatment. Restraint utilization increased during the study driven primarily by increases in ketamine and restraints utilized during trauma bay evaluation and resuscitation.

Future research should assess the generalizability of these findings. It is important that rigorous guidelines are established to ensure the safe and effective use of restraints in trauma.
 

The Social Context of Mental Health, Bereavement, and Grief (American Journal of Public Health)
Journal Article
Journal Article

The Social Context of Mental Health, Bereavement, and Grief (American Journal of Public Health)

This special issue of the American Journal of Public Health (AJPH), co-edited by UCLA Professor and UCLA CHPR Senior Fellow Vickie Mays, PhD, and UCLA Professor Susan Cochran, PhD, addresses improving the conditions that promote mental health and prevent mental disorders.

The papers explore innovations to infuse a public mental health agenda more thoroughly into interventions, research, and legislative and social policies. 

Topics include the impact of COVID-19 on youths and the need for public health policy advisories that focus on mental health consequences in addition to infection control; the increasing rates of suicide among Black youths, some as young as 5 years of age; the importance of primary care referrals that consider gendered differences in the expression of distress; the history of racism that continues to affect the diagnoses and treatment of African Americans; and the impact of the devastating fire in Lahaina on residents' well-being.

Read the Publication:

Mays also co-authored the following articles in the issue:

Center in the News

Climate Change Threatens the Mental Well-Being of Youths. Here’s How To Help Them Cope.

Vickie May, senior fellow at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, points out that even crises can become opportunities for people to learn to become advocates or activists. News https://californiahealthline.org/news/article/climate-change-anxiety-teen-youth-mental-health/

View all In the News

Center in the News

Vickie Mays receives lifetime achievement award

Distinguished psychology professor Vickie Mays has received the 2024 Association for Psychological Science James S. Jackson Lifetime Achievement Award for Transformative Scholarship.

News https://newsroom.ucla.edu/dept/faculty/vickie-mays-receives-lifetime-achievement-award
Center in the News

Accessing mental health care for survivors of violence

Without workers, no amount of funding or tweaking mental health policies will be enough, says Vickie Mays, a psychology professor and director of the BRITE Center for Science, Research, and Policy (Bridging Research Innovation, Training, and Education) at UCLA. She says the state and federal government need to increase mental health training programs and encourage more students to enter the field.

News https://www.yesmagazine.org/health-happiness/2023/08/15/mental-health-access-survivors-violence